Framework for Evaluating Governmental Support in the Urban Entrepreneurship Ecosystem of Tehran Using a Qualitative Approach
Keywords:
Technology, Technology Transfer, Entrepreneurship, Technological Entrepreneurship, Industry 5.0.Abstract
Today, the world stands on the threshold of the Fifth Industrial Revolution. This new paradigm is based on the convergence of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, robotics, virtual and augmented reality, and biotechnologies. With the rapid evolution of the Industry 4.0 paradigm and the emergence of the Industry 5.0 landscape, there is an urgent need to examine and analyze the enabling or inhibiting factors of effective technology transfer processes. Technology transfer refers to the systematic movement of knowledge from individuals or organizations that have generated it to others, so that it may be utilized for producing new products or delivering innovative services. The present research was conducted with the aim of exploring the dimensions and key components affecting technology transfer within the Industry 5.0 framework, with a particular focus on the technological entrepreneurship approach. This is of critical importance, since technological entrepreneurship plays a pivotal role in advancing innovation and transforming scientific achievements into commercialized products and services. In this study, the qualitative Sandelowski and Barroso meta-synthesis method was employed. The process began with a systematic review of 457 initial articles, and eventually, 28 articles relevant to the research objectives were selected. Inclusion criteria comprised articles published in the field of technological entrepreneurship and Industry 5.0 during the period from 2017 to 2024. To assess the reliability of the findings, Cohen’s Kappa coefficient (0.72) was applied, which indicates acceptable reliability. For validating the proposed model and enhancing its credibility, expert review techniques were used. Moreover, the results were confirmed and revised by domain experts. Based on the findings derived from the meta-synthesis, 55 components were identified and categorized into five main dimensions as influencing factors on technology transfer within the Industry 5.0 framework through a technological entrepreneurship lens. These dimensions include: (1) technological innovation ecosystems, comprising technological infrastructure, specialized human capital, and free flow of knowledge; (2) agile and flexible business models aligned with rapid technological changes; (3) collaborative partnerships among diverse actors of the innovation ecosystem; (4) digitalization of processes and data-driven decision-making; and (5) appropriate legal, policy, and supportive frameworks. The findings of this study highlighted the significance of adopting entrepreneurial strategies and approaches in order to facilitate and shape technology transfer processes within the Industry 5.0 landscape. Results indicated that success in technology transfer in this domain requires comprehensive attention to infrastructural, commercial, legal, and interactive factors within an integrated innovation ecosystem. By identifying and clarifying the key factors involved in successful technology transfer initiatives in Industry 5.0, this study provides insights and practical guidance for policymakers, technological entrepreneurs, and other stakeholders engaged in these processes. These findings can substantially contribute to strengthening technology transfer mechanisms and guiding innovative orientations in the forthcoming era of Industry 5.0.
Downloads
References
[1] J. Ughulu, "Entrepreneurship as a major driver of wealth creation," International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 78-82, 2022, doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20221003.11.
[2] A. O. Ajayi-Nifise, "The role of government policy in fostering entrepreneurship: a USA and Africa review," International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 352-367, 2024, doi: 10.51594/ijmer.v6i2.775.
[3] D. B. Audretsch, "Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 42, pp. 1030-1051, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8.
[4] B. Spigel, "The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Entrepreneurship theory and practice, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 49-72, 2017, doi: 10.1111/etap.12167.
[5] A. Davari, "The factors of entrepreneurial ecosystem in Iran based on Isenberg's model," Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 101-120, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65903-9_1.
[6] A. Maysami, "The dimensions and components of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem in Iran," Journal of Technology Development Management, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 9-42, 2018.
[7] E. Mack, "The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Urban studies, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 2118-2133, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0042098015586547.
[8] H. Cheng, "Does government paternalistic care promote entrepreneurship in China? Evidence from the China employer-employee survey," China Economic Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 61-75, 2017, doi: 10.1080/17538963.2016.1274004.
[9] M. Saberi, "The moderating role of governmental support in the relationship between entrepreneurship and economic growth: A study on the GCC countries," Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 200-216, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JEEE-10-2017-0072.
[10] N. Thawesaengskulthai, A. Chatmarathong, and J. Koiwanit, "Impact and Policy Supporting Thailand Innovation Driven Enterprise: Orchestrating University Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ecosystem With Public and Private Stakeholders," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, vol. 13, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s13731-024-00371-x.
[11] G. W. Brown, "Filling the us small business funding gap," UNC Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise, 2020.
[12] R. Zajkowski, "Differences in perception of regional pro-entrepreneurial policy: does obtaining support change a prospect?," Oeconomia Copernicana, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 359-384, 2019, doi: 10.24136/oc.2019.018.
[13] K. M. Khazai, "Conceptualizing university entrepreneurial marketing by quantitative approach," INNOVATION & CREATIVITY IN HUMAN SCIENCE, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 21-62, 2021.
[14] M. Feyz, "Developing a model of communication skills for managers in the public sector," Postmodern Openings, no. 1Sup1, pp. 61-77, 2020, doi: 10.18662/po/11.1sup1/123.
[15] N. Baporikar, "Entrepreneurship in Sultanate of Oman: A case approach," in Entrepreneurship: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications: IGI Global, 2017, pp. 1852-1864.
[16] E. Stam, "Measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems," in Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Place-based transformations and transitions, 2018, pp. 173-197.
[17] B. Spigel, "Developing and governing entrepreneurial ecosystems: the structure of entrepreneurial support programs in Edinburgh, Scotland," International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 141-160, 2016, doi: 10.1504/IJIRD.2016.077889.
[18] R. Brown, "Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Small business economics, vol. 49, pp. 11-30, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7.
[19] Y. Huang, J. Zhang, Y. Xu, Y. Yuan, M. Zhang, and L. Huang, "Digital entrepreneurial ecosystem and female entrepreneurial activity," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-04345-y.
[20] S. Berenji, "Designing a new behavioral model of blockchain technology acceptance in public banks," Journal of System Management (JSM), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 225-236, 2024.
[21] J. Leendertse and F. V. Rijnsoever, "Greening pastures: Ecosystems for sustainable entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1-22, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11187-025-01040-3.
[22] T. Bielialov and E. Ashyrov, "Innovation Ecosystem as a Tool for Development of an Entrepreneurial University," Economic Scope, no. 198, pp. 3-8, 2025, doi: 10.30838/ep.198.3-8.
[23] B. Salehi Koocheh, "Presenting a Model of Organizational Insentience in the Red Crescent Society," Sci J Rescue Relief, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 228-236, 2021, doi: 10.32592/jorar.2021.13.3.8.
[24] D. Kiakojouri, "Identifying the Dimensions and Components of the Cooperative Structure in Iran with the Approach of Waqf and Charity Affairs Based on Mixed Research," Journal of Endowment & Charity Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 185-202, 2024.
[25] A. Pustovrh, "The role of open innovation in developing an entrepreneurial support ecosystem," Technological forecasting and social change, vol. 152, p. 119892, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119892.
[26] T. Mehmood, "Schumpeterian entrepreneurship theory: Evolution and relevance," Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, vol. 25, no. 4, 2019.
[27] R. K. Kumar et al., "Innovation dynamics within the entrepreneurial ecosystem: a content analysis-based literature review," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 366, 2024/03/06 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-02817-9.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Arameh Pazhoom, Jahangir Yadollahi Farsi, Davood kia kojouri, Mohammad Javad Taghipurian (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.