Identifying Barriers to Transparent AI Governance in Human-Centered Work Design

Authors

    Soodabeh Keshavarz Department of Management, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
    Alireza Foruzandeh * Department of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Department of Counseling, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran alireza.foruzandeh@gmail.com

Keywords:

AI governance, transparency, human-centered design, organizational ethics

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the organizational, sociotechnical, and cultural barriers to implementing transparent AI governance within human-centered work environments. A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews with 27 participants from diverse public and private sector organizations based in Tehran. Participants were selected using purposive sampling to capture a range of roles including management, IT, policy, and human resources. Interviews were conducted until theoretical saturation was achieved. Each interview was transcribed and analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis. NVivo software facilitated systematic coding, enabling the emergence of main themes and subthemes from the data. The analysis yielded three overarching themes: structural and organizational constraints, sociotechnical misalignments, and cultural and cognitive barriers. Participants identified key challenges such as the absence of AI policy frameworks, siloed decision-making, and lack of ethical oversight mechanisms. Sociotechnical barriers included exclusion of stakeholders in AI development, technological opacity, and poor integration with human workflows. Cultural issues like distrust in AI systems, low AI literacy, and fear of job displacement further hindered transparent governance. These findings align with prior studies emphasizing the regulatory, ethical, and human-centered dimensions of AI transparency. The results demonstrate that transparency is not solely a technical feature but a multidimensional construct requiring organizational capacity, ethical culture, and inclusive governance processes. Transparent AI governance in human-centered work design is undermined by intersecting structural, technical, and cultural barriers. Overcoming these challenges requires a shift from compliance-based models to participatory and ethics-driven approaches that prioritize stakeholder engagement, organizational learning, and adaptive oversight. Addressing these barriers is essential for building trust, accountability, and fairness in the workplace as AI technologies become increasingly embedded in decision-making systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. K. Pasupuleti, "Artificial Intelligence in Business Law: Navigating Regulation, Ethics, and Governance," pp. 19-35, 2024, doi: 10.62311/nesx/66203.

[2] G. Kalkan, "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Corporate Governance," Journal of Corporate Finance Research / Корпоративные Финансы | Issn 2073-0438, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 17-25, 2024, doi: 10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.18.2.2024.17-25.

[3] A. Karami, "Artificial Intelligence Governance in the European Union," Jes, vol. 20, no. 11s, pp. 2706-2720, 2024, doi: 10.52783/jes.7938.

[4] N. Ahmad, M. Anshari, M. Hamdan, and E. Ali, "Ethics and Public Trust in Ai Governance: A Literature Review," International Journal of Law Government and Communication, vol. 9, no. 37, pp. 296-305, 2024, doi: 10.35631/ijlgc.937025.

[5] M. Taddeo, "The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Defence," 2024, doi: 10.1093/oso/9780197745441.001.0001.

[6] D. Singh, "Navigating the Digital Age: Smart AI Ethics for Seamless Transformation," International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, vol. 13, no. 11, 2024, doi: 10.15662/ijareeie.2024.1311001.

[7] G. A. Chintoh, O. D. Segun-Falade, C. S. Odionu, and A. H. Ekeh, "Legal and Ethical Challenges in AI Governance: A Conceptual Approach to Developing Ethical Compliance Models in the U.S," Ijsser, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 103-109, 2024, doi: 10.54660/ijsser.2024.3.1.103-109.

[8] E. Aref, "Beyond Algorithms: A Framework for Ethical Assessment of AI Applications in Industry," 2024, doi: 10.32388/3rhk4f.

[9] A. J. Obinna and A. J. Kess-Momoh, "Comparative Technical Analysis of Legal and Ethical Frameworks in AI-enhanced Procurement Processes," World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1415-1430, 2024, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.22.1.1241.

[10] J. W. Njoroge, "Comparative Analysis of Ai Governance in Africa Relative to Global Standards and Practices," Iosr Journal of Computer Engineering, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 19-25, 2024, doi: 10.9790/0661-2605031925.

[11] Y. J. Inomovich, "Legal Regulation of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Corporate Governance," Uzbek J. Law Digi. Policy, vol. 1, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.59022/ujldp.94.

[12] P. David, H. Choung, and J. S. Seberger, "Who Is Responsible? US Public Perceptions of AI Governance Through the Lenses of Trust and Ethics," Public Understanding of Science, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 654-672, 2024, doi: 10.1177/09636625231224592.

[13] J. Krijger, "Operationalising Ethics for AI in the Financial Industry: Insights From the Volksbank Case Study," JDB, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 220, 2023, doi: 10.69554/yqzc2796.

[14] M. K. Pasupuleti, "Ethical AI Governance: A Global Blueprint," pp. 60-77, 2024, doi: 10.62311/nesx/97832.

[15] W. Jing-jing, W. Mao, and W. Wenjie, "The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Sociopolitical and Legal Dimensions," Isslp, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 27-32, 2023, doi: 10.61838/kman.isslp.2.2.6.

[16] Z. S. Zuwanda, A. F. Lubis, N. Solapari, M. S. Sakmaf, and A. Triyantoro, "Ethical and Legal Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Systems in Law Enforcement With a Study of Potential Human Rights Violations in Indonesia," The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, vol. 2, no. 03, pp. 176-185, 2024, doi: 10.58812/eslhr.v2i03.283.

[17] Y. Wan, Z. Peng, F. Wu, J. Gao, and M. Li, "Understanding Public Concerned Ethic Issues and Ethical Acceptance of AI Surveillance Technology: Analysis From Social Media Data," 2024, doi: 10.3233/faia231257.

[18] R. P. Adhikary, "Ethical and Philosophical Parallels of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Hindu Mythology the Mahabharat," Mong. J. Arts. Cult., vol. 25, no. 49, pp. 112-120, 2024, doi: 10.69561/mjac.v25i49.3834.

[19] V. K. Manda, V. Christy, and M. R. Jitta, "Ethical AI and Decision-Making in Management Leadership," pp. 197-226, 2024, doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-4147-6.ch009.

[20] T. M. Kolade, "Artificial Intelligence and Global Security: Strengthening International Cooperation and Diplomatic Relations," Archives of Current Research International, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 23-47, 2024, doi: 10.9734/acri/2024/v24i11945.

[21] M. H. Hadi and A. A. Jasim, "Legislative and Ethical Foundations for Future Artificial Intelligence," Journal of the College of Basic Education, vol. 30, no. 126, pp. 127-145, 2024, doi: 10.35950/cbej.v30i126.12231.

[22] Y. T. Naili, E. L. Simanjuntak, and A. Kostruba, "The Role of AI in Health Research: A Policy Review of Higher Education Foundations," J. Adv. H. Inf. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 102-108, 2024, doi: 10.59247/jahir.v2i2.295.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-01

Submitted

2024-08-18

Revised

2024-09-12

Accepted

2024-09-22

How to Cite

Keshavarz, S., & Foruzandeh, A. (2024). Identifying Barriers to Transparent AI Governance in Human-Centered Work Design. Future of Work and Digital Management Journal, 2(4), 1-11. https://journalfwdmj.com/index.php/fwdmj/article/view/32

Similar Articles

1-10 of 41

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.