Presenting a Policy Implementation Model in the Field of Urban Management

Authors

    Abolghasem Manteghi PhD Student, Department of Public Management, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran
    Hassan Forati * Assistant Professor, Department of public Management, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran hassan.forati@pnu.ac.ir
    Kambiz Esmaeilnia Shirvani Department of Educational Management, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran

Keywords:

Policy implementation, three-stage coding, grounded theory, intra-organizational factors, implementation strategies, meritocracy

Abstract

This study was conducted with the aim of presenting a policy implementation model in the field of urban management. The data analysis method in the qualitative phase was based on the grounded theory approach and an exploratory–survey design. The statistical population consisted of 10 experts from the Semnan Province Municipality, who were selected through purposive sampling. The research instrument comprised semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was carried out using a three-stage coding process, including open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. The data obtained from semi-structured interviews with 10 experts were analyzed line by line, and the main and subcategories were extracted. Based on the findings, “intra-organizational characteristics affecting urban management policy implementation” were identified as the core category. Contextual conditions included policy principles, values, and norms, as well as the development of behavioral patterns. Causal conditions encompassed factors such as the creation of job attachment, motivation enhancement, justice and delegation of authority, learning, and employee empowerment. Intervening conditions included environmental stimuli, laws and regulations, cultural and social factors, and the economic and political conditions of the environment, all of which influenced policy implementation. In response to these conditions, the organization pursued a set of key strategies, including the formulation of a policy charter, adoption of a systematic approach, structural reform, institutionalization of policy culture, meritocracy, and the development of specialized training programs. The outcomes of successful policy implementation included the enhancement of meritocracy, realization of organizational justice, reduction of administrative corruption, improvement of performance evaluation, enhancement of the quality of urban services, and strengthening of leadership and organizational interactions. The final model of the study demonstrated that urban management policy implementation is a multidimensional process dependent on the dynamic interaction among individual, organizational, and environmental factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. Hill and P. Hupe, Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance, 3 ed. SAGE Publications, 2014.

[2] L. J. O'Toole, "Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects," Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 263-288, 2000, doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270.

[3] J. L. Pressman and A. Wildavsky, Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press, 1984.

[4] R. E. Matland, "Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation," Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 145-174, 1995.

[5] P. Healey, G. Cars, A. Madanipour, and C. De Magalhães, "Urban governance capacity in complex societies: challenges of institutional adaptation," in Urban governance, institutional capacity and social milieux: Routledge, 2017, pp. 204-225.

[6] J. M. Bryson, B. C. Crosby, and L. Bloomberg, "Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the New Public Management," Public Administration Review, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 445-456, 2014, doi: 10.1111/puar.12238.

[7] J. M. Bryson, B. C. Crosby, and L. Bloomberg, "Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the New Public Management," Public Administration Review, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 445-456, 2018, doi: 10.1111/puar.12238.

[8] S. Fernandez and H. G. Rainey, "Managing successful organizational change in the public sector," Public Administration Review, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 168-176, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00570.x.

[9] C. V. Hawkins and R. M. Krause, "Decisions institutions, policy arenas, and inter-departmental collective action around urban sustainability," Urban Governance, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 35-44, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ugj.2022.11.005.

[10] D. Galego, G. Esposito, and N. Crutzen, "Sustainable urban development: A scoping review of barriers to the public policy and administration," Public Policy and Administration, 2024, doi: 10.1177/09520767241266410.

[11] R. Habibi, A. Ramsay, M. Zach, B. Javad, and Z. Khan, "A systems thinking approach to inclusive governance," Discover Global Society, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 169, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44282-025-00317-y.

[12] M. J. Dorado-Rubín, M. J. Guerrero-Mayo, and C. J. Navarro-Yáñez, "Policy integration in urban policies as multi-level policy mixes," Policy Sciences, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 45-67, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11077-024-09562-5.

[13] G. Doci, H. Dorst, S. Hillen, and T. Tjokrodikromo, "Urban transition governance in practice: exploring how European cities govern local transitions to achieve climate neutrality," Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, vol. 7, p. 1559356, 2025, doi: 10.3389/frsc.2025.1559356.

[14] L. Mora, P. Gerli, L. Ardito, and A. M. Petruzzelli, "Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda," Technovation, vol. 123, p. 102717, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102717.

[15] T. Sulistyaningsih, R. A. Purnama, and U. Kulsum, "Smart City Policy: Strategy and Implementation to Realize Smart Urban Governance in Indonesia," Journal of Governance and Public Policy, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 105-117, 2023, doi: 10.18196/jgpp.v10i1.13840.

[16] M. Jiang, "How public policies are implemented: a comparison of urban domestic waste classification policy implementation models," Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 22, p. 15480, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142215480.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

Submitted

2025-10-10

Revised

2026-01-16

Accepted

2026-01-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Manteghi, A., Forati, H., & Esmaeilnia Shirvani, K. (2026). Presenting a Policy Implementation Model in the Field of Urban Management. Future of Work and Digital Management Journal, 1-10. https://journalfwdmj.com/index.php/fwdmj/article/view/210

Similar Articles

11-20 of 143

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.